Contributors
- Alastair Norcross
- Alison Hills
- Andrew Reisner
- Antti Kauppinen
- Bart Streumer
- Brian McElwee
- Dan Moller
- Daniel Star
- David Enoch
- David Owens
- David Wasserman
- Fiona Woollard
- Frances Kamm
- Gerald Lang
- Gilbert Harman
- Guy Kahane
- Hagop Sarkissian
- Helen Frowe
- Iwao Hirose
- James Morauta
- Japa Pallikkathayil
- Jeff McMahan
- John Broome
- John Oberdiek
- Jonas Olson
- Joseph Raz
- Julia Driver
- Kimberley Brownlee
- Krister Bykvist
- Laura Franklin-Hall
- Matthew Smith
- Matthew Silverstein
- Melinda Roberts
- Mike Otsuka
- Neil Levy
- Nicholas Southwood
- Nick Shackel
- Nir Eyal
- Rahul Kumar
- Rebecca Roache
- Richard Ashcroft
- S. Matthew Liao
- Saul Smilansky
- Sergio Tenenbaum
- Shlomi Segall
- Simon Kirchin
- Stephen Kearns
- Thom Brooks
- Toby Ord
- Tom Douglas
- Tom Hurka
- Ulrike Heuer
- Wlodek Rabinowicz
Readings
-

From Normativity to Responsibility
Joseph Raz
-

Ethics and Moral Philosophy
Thom Brooks
-

Ethics and Humanity: Themes from the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover
N. Ann Davis, Richard Keshen and Jeff McMahan
-

Reflective Knowledge
Ernest Sosa
-

Know How
Jason Stanley
-

New Waves in Ethics
Thom Brooks
-

Ethics for Enemies: Terror, Torture, and War
F. M. Kamm
-

On What Matters
Derek Parfit
-

Semantic Relationism
Kit Fine
-

All the Power in the World
Peter Unger
-

Reliable Reasoning: Induction and Statistical Learning Theory
Gilbert Harman and Sanjeev Kulkarni
-

Beyond Humanity?
Allen E. Buchanan
-

Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality
Patricia S. Churchland
-

Equality and Tradition
Samuel Scheffler
-

Climate Ethics
Stephen Gardiner, Simon Caney, Dale Jamieson and Henry Shue
-

The Character of Consciousness
David J. Chalmers
-

Secular Philosophy and the Religious Temperament
Thomas Nagel
-

Well-Being and Death
Ben Bradley
-

The Beloved Self: Morality and the Challenge from Egoisim
Alison Hills
-

Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation
Michael Strevens
-

The Case for Contextualism
Keith DeRose
-

When Truth Gives Out
Mark Richard
-

The Idea of Human Rights
Charles R. Beitz
-

Willing, Wanting, Waiting
Richard Holton
-

The Idea of Justice
Amartya Sen
-

Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem
Melinda A. Roberts and David T. Wasserman
-

What Is Good and Why: The Ethics of Well-Being
Richard Kraut
-

Content and Justification
Paul A. Boghossian
-

Thoughts: Papers on Mind, Meaning, and Modality
Stephen Yablo
-

Normativity
Judith Jarvis Thomson
-

How We Get Along
J. David Velleman
-

Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity
Christine M. Korsgaard
-

Appearances of the Good: An Essay on the Nature of Practical Reason
Sergio Tenenbaum
-

Killing in War
Jeff McMahan
-

Experimental Philosophy
Joshua Knobe and Shaun Nichols
-

Disadvantage
Jonathan Wolff and Avner de-Shalit
-

Reconciling Our Aims: In Search of Bases for Ethics
Allan Gibbard
-

Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame
T. M. Scanlon
-

The Philosophy of Philosophy
Timothy Williamson
-

Morality without Foundations
Mark Timmons
-

Authority and Estrangement
Richard Moran
-

Moral Psychology, Volume 1
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
-

The Reflective Life
Valerie Tiberius
-

Moral Literacy
Barbara Herman
-

On Human Rights
James Griffin
-

Experiments in Ethics
Kwame Anthony Appiah
-

Reasons without Rationalism
Kieran Setiya
-

Moral Realism: A Defence
Russ Shafer-Landau
-

The Way We Eat
Peter Singer and Jim Mason
-

Metaphysical Essays
John Hawthorne
-

10 Moral Paradoxes
Saul Smilansky
-

Normativity and the Will
R. Jay Wallace
-

Ideal Code, Real World
Brad Hooker
-

The Nature of Normativity
Ralph Wedgwood
-

Structures of Agency: Essays
Michael E. Bratman
-

The Second-Person Standpoint
Stephen Darwall
-

Ethics and the A Priori
Michael Smith
-

Weighing Lives
John Broome
-

Reasons and the Good
Roger Crisp
-
-
Print This Post
October 14, 2008
The Moral Sense Test for Philosophers
By Neil Levy
Many of you will be familiar with the Moral Sense Test, which has produced some valuable data on ordinary people’s intuitions about trolley cases and related dilemmas. Eric Schwitzgebel, a philosopher of mind (who does fascinating work on the unreliability of first person judgments) and Fiery Cushman, from Marc Hauser’s lab at Harvard, have now designed a version of the test especially for philosophers. They want to be able to compare the responses of people with graduate degrees in philosophy to those of the folk. I encourage everyone to take the test; it shouldn’t take more than fifteen minutes.
The test can be found here.
Posted on October 14, 2008 at 1:35 am in Experimental Ethics, Neil Levy's Posts, Normative Ethics, Philosophical Methods
Comments
Post a comment
-
Recent Posts
- JOB: Lectureships at Stanford
- Tim Maudlin in the Atlantic
- CFA: Moral Psychology and Poverty Alleviation
- Society for Applied Philosophy 30th Anniversary Post-Doctoral Fellowship
- The Eastern APA Is Moving To Early January!
- CFP: Consciousness and Moral Cognition
- CFP: Theories of Action and Morality in Spain
- CFP: Ohio Philosophical Association Annual Meeting
- CFA: Moral Motivation at Gothenburg
- CFP: Oxford Political Theory Graduate Conference
Recent Comments
- Gunnar Björnsson on CFA: Moral Motivation at Gothenburg
- Andreas Moser on Websites for Jobs in Philosophy
- Minh Nguyen on Philosophy in funny places
- Saul Smilansky on Philosophy in funny places
- Matt Lister on Philosophy in funny places
- Minh Nguyen on Philosophy in funny places
- Dabney Lyles on Boghossian on Moral Relativism
- Matt Hoberg on Boghossian on Moral Relativism
- Yashar Saghai on Nudge, nudge. Know what I mean?
- Hanno Sauer on Nudge, nudge. Know what I mean?
- Thom Brooks on Nudge, nudge. Know what I mean?
- Ezio Di Nucci on Nudge, nudge. Know what I mean?
- Paul Kelleher on Nudge, nudge. Know what I mean?
- Mark Alfano on Nudge, nudge. Know what I mean?
- Regina Rini on Nudge, nudge. Know what I mean?
Categories
- Alastair Norcross's Posts
- Andrew Reisner's Posts
- Antti Kauppinen's Posts
- Appiah Reading Group
- Applied Ethics
- Bioethics
- Conference Announcement
- Contributors
- Dan Moller's Posts
- Daniel Star's Posts
- David Enoch's Posts
- David Wasserman's Posts
- Dominic Wilkinson's Posts
- Economics and Philosophy
- Environmental Ethics
- Epistemic Ethics
- Epistemology
- Ethics Etc Poll
- Experimental Ethics
- Experimental Philosophy
- Free Will
- General Announcement
- Gerald Lang's Posts
- Gilbert Harman's Posts
- Guy Kahane's Posts
- Hagop Sarkissian's Posts
- Helen Frowe's Posts
- Issues in the Profession
- Iwao Hirose's Posts
- Jonas Olson's Posts
- Joseph Raz's Posts
- Julia Driver's Posts
- Kamm Poll
- Kamm Reading Group
- Kimberley Brownlee's Posts
- Legal Philosophy
- Logic
- Mark Sheehan's Posts
- Matthew Smith's Posts
- Melinda Roberts's Posts
- Metaethics
- Metaphysics
- Mike Otsuka's Posts
- Moral Epistemology
- Moral Psychology
- Neil Levy's Posts
- Neuroethics
- Neuroscience of Morality
- Nick Shackel's Posts
- Nir Eyal's Posts
- Normative Ethics
- Oxford Moral Philosophy Seminar
- Philosophical Methods
- Philosophy of Action
- Philosophy of biology
- Philosophy of Language
- Philosophy of Mind
- Philosophy of Physics
- Political Philosophy
- Practical Ethics
- Rahul Kumar's Posts
- Rebecca Roache's Posts
- S. Matthew Liao's Posts
- Saul Smilansky's Posts
- Sergio Tenenbaum's Posts
- Simon Kirchin's Posts
- Stephen Kearns's Posts
- Thom Brooks's Posts
- Toby Ord's Posts
- Tom Douglas's Posts
- Ulrike Heuer's Posts
- Value Theory
Online Philosophy Journals
Philosophy Blogs
- Arché Methodology Project
- BrainEthics
- Brains
- Certain Doubts
- David Chalmer’s List of Blogs
- Epistemic Value
- Experimental Philosophy
- Flickers of Freedom
- Legal Theory Blog
- Leiter’s Report
- Matters of Substance
- Natural Rationality
- Neuroethics and Law
- PEA Soup
- Philosopher’s Digest
- Philosophy TV
- Practical Ethics
- Public Reason
- The Brooks Blog
- The Garden of Forking Paths
- Thoughts, Rants, and Arguments
Philosophy Resources
Meta




1. Posted by Alexander West | November 2, 2008 9:30 am
I started completing this test however once I got to the two questions which included a description of the indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand as Maori tribesmen I stopped. While I am a Pakeha New Zealander, part of my family is Maori and I found the use of this description belittling and insulting at the most extreme end. Further the implication that Maori are essentially utilitarian in their ethical understandings and worldview showed a woeful lack of understanding and experience of Maori culture, philosophy and kaitiakitanga. Maori are a strong and vibrant presence in NZ society: government organisations, courts, universities etc operate on a bilingual basis, there are a large number of very successful Maori-led businesses and corporations, Maori hold senior positions at all universities and are represented in Parliament in both the Maori and general seats. I was stunned to see that the creators of the MST thought it was acceptable to refer to them in such a derogatory, condescending and elitist manner.
Alexander J West