<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ethics Etc &#187; Epistemic Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ethics-etc.com/category/epistemic-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ethics-etc.com</link>
	<description>A forum for discussing contemporary philosophical issues in ethics and related areas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>

		<item>
		<title>CF: Intuition and Evidence &#8211; Naturalistic or Anti-Naturalistic</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/15/cf-intuition-and-evidence-naturalistic-or-anti-naturalistic/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/15/cf-intuition-and-evidence-naturalistic-or-anti-naturalistic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=1632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[June 12 -14, 2012 Location: MSH Lorraine, Campus of the University of Lorraine, Nancy, France 91, av. de la Libération, 3rd floor. This conference is about intuitions and their epistemic role as evidence. Is there any epistemological explanation justifying the appeal to intuition in philosophy? How can different models of intuitions explain their possible roles? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/15/cf-intuition-and-evidence-naturalistic-or-anti-naturalistic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CFP: The Nature of the Enkratic Requirement of Rationality</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/05/cfp-the-nature-of-the-enkratic-requirement-of-rationality/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/05/cfp-the-nature-of-the-enkratic-requirement-of-rationality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 22:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=1615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Special Issue on The Nature of the Enkratic Requirement of Rationality Organon F – International Journal of Analytic Philosophy Guest Editor: Julian Fink (University of Vienna) Submission deadline: October 1st 2012 Confirmed contributors: John Broome (Oxford) John Brunero (Missouri-St Louis) Herlinde Pauer-Studer (Vienna) Christian Piller (York) Andrew Reisner (McGill) Jonathan Way (Southampton) Ralph Wedgwood (USC) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/05/cfp-the-nature-of-the-enkratic-requirement-of-rationality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONF: Epistemic norms from a naturalist viewpoint</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/22/conf-epistemic-norms-from-a-naturalist-viewpoint/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/22/conf-epistemic-norms-from-a-naturalist-viewpoint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 04:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 7-8, 2010 Institut Jean-Nicod (Paris) THURSDAY 7 OCTOBER Salle Dussane Ecole Normale Supérieure 45, rue d&#8217;Ulm 10h30: Georgy Gergely (Budapest): Psychological Essentialism: The origins of representing artifact kinds. 11h45: Beate Sodian (Munich): Development of epistemic norm sensitivity in children. 13h00: lunch 14h30: Asher Koriat (HaÏfa): Subjective convictions and social consensus: Evidence from research on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/22/conf-epistemic-norms-from-a-naturalist-viewpoint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONF: Naturalism and the Nature of Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/18/conf-naturalism-and-the-nature-of-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/18/conf-naturalism-and-the-nature-of-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 03:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[47th Cincinnati Philosophy Colloquium 21-23 October 2010 425 Tangeman University Center University of Cincinnati Speakers: • Owen Flanagan, Duke University • Hilary Kornblith, University of Massachusetts • Michael Lynch, University of Connecticut • Penelope Maddy, University of California • David Papineau, King&#8217;s College London • L. A. Paul, University of North Carolina • Thomas Polger, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/18/conf-naturalism-and-the-nature-of-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workshop on theoretical and practical reasons</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/29/workshop-on-theoretical-and-practical-reasons/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/29/workshop-on-theoretical-and-practical-reasons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ulrike Heuer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ulrike Heuer's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http://sites.google.com/site/workshop2010site/home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the Centre for Ethics and Metaethics (CEM), University of Leeds Programme 24th June 2-3:30 Daniel Elstein: &#8216;Can We Do Without Epistemic Value?&#8217; 3:30-3:45 Coffee break 3:45-6:30 Symposium on Reasons and Evidence: Daniel Star, Stephen Kearns and Kieran Setiya 3:45-4:30 Daniel Star &#38; Stephen Kearns: &#8216;Weighing Reasons&#8217; 4:30-5:15 Kieran Setiya: &#8216;What Is A Reason to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/29/workshop-on-theoretical-and-practical-reasons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CFP: St. Louis Conference on Reasons and Rationality</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/12/cfp-st-louis-conference-on-reasons-and-rationality/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/12/cfp-st-louis-conference-on-reasons-and-rationality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/12/cfp-st-louis-conference-on-reasons-and-rationality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first St. Louis Annual Conference on Reasons and Rationality (SLACRR) will take place May 23-25, 2010 at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. The conference is designed to provide a forum for new work on practical and theoretical reason, broadly construed. Please submit an abstract of 500-1000 words by December 31, 2009 to SLACRR (at) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/12/cfp-st-louis-conference-on-reasons-and-rationality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copenhagen Epistemology Workshop</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/10/copenhagen-epistemology-workshop/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/10/copenhagen-epistemology-workshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/10/copenhagen-epistemology-workshop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Date: October 29, 2009 Venue: Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen (Amager), Room 14.2.50 Schedule: 10.30-12.00: Adam Carter (Edinburgh/Geneva): Knowledge, Testimony and Philosophical Expertise 13.15-14.45 S. Matthew Liao (Oxford): Disagreeing with Peers 15.00-16.30: Peter Graham (UC Riverside): Reliability and Entitlement 16.45-18.15: Mikkel Gerken (SERG, Copenhagen): Univocal Reasoning and Inferential Presuppositions There is no registration fee. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/10/copenhagen-epistemology-workshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Epistemology Workshop at Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/28/social-epistemology-workshop-at-copenhagen/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/28/social-epistemology-workshop-at-copenhagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/28/social-epistemology-workshop-at-copenhagen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Social Epistemology Research Group (SERG) at the University of Copenhagen is hosting a one-day epistemology workshop. The workshop is part of a series of workshops and conferences to be held in connection with the research project &#8220;The Epistemology of Liberal Democracy: Truth, Free Speech, and Disagreement,&#8221; funded by the Velux Foundation. The details are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/28/social-epistemology-workshop-at-copenhagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workshop on Disagreement at Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/05/workshop-on-disagreement-at-copenhagen/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/05/workshop-on-disagreement-at-copenhagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/05/workshop-on-disagreement-at-copenhagen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WORKSHOP ON DISAGREEMENT August 14, 2009 University of Copenhagen, Denmark CONFERENCE PROGRAM: 09.00 – 09.15: Coffee and tea 09.15 – 10.00: Berit Brogaard: Reasonable Disagreement and Entitlements to Trust 10.15 – 11.00: Richard Feldman: Evidentialism, Higher-Order Evidence, and Disagreements. 11.15 – 12.00: Jesper Kallestrup: Bootstrap and Rollback: Epistemic Circularity Generalized. 12.00 – 13.15: Lunch 13.15 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/05/workshop-on-disagreement-at-copenhagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epistemic Normativity Workshop at Fordham</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/04/epistemic-normativity-workshop-at-fordham/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/04/epistemic-normativity-workshop-at-fordham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/04/epistemic-normativity-workshop-at-fordham/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fordham University is holding a workshop on Epistemic Normativity on April 16th and 17th, 2010. Fordham University Lincoln Center Campus April 16th and 17th, 2010 Speakers: Jeremy Fantl (Calgary) &#038; Matt McGrath (Missouri) Richard Foley (NYU) John Greco (St. Louis) Thomas Kelly (Princeton) Michael Lynch (Connecticut) Linda Martin-Alcoff (CUNY) Wayne Riggs (Oklahoma) Dennis Whitcomb (Western [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/04/epistemic-normativity-workshop-at-fordham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oslo Conference on the Aim of Belief</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/05/15/oslo-conference-on-the-aim-of-belief/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/05/15/oslo-conference-on-the-aim-of-belief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/05/15/oslo-conference-on-the-aim-of-belief/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature, University of Oslo, will host an international conference on the Aim of Belief on 11-13 June, 2009. Registration is free and includes lunches and coffee. Spaces are limited. Please register by emailing your name and affiliation to &#116;.&#104;&#46;&#119;.&#99;&#104;&#97;&#110;&#64;i&#102;&#105;k&#107;&#46;ui&#111;.no ** by WEDNESDAY 20TH MAY** Time and place: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/05/15/oslo-conference-on-the-aim-of-belief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epistemic ethics</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/02/02/epistemic-ethics/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/02/02/epistemic-ethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Shackel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Shackel's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/02/02/epistemic-ethics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is good and bad? What is virtue and vice? How should we live? These are the big questions of ethics. They are also deeply practical questions. The point is not simply to know the answers but to do what is right and to avoid what is wrong. Through action we pursue ends, manifest character [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/02/02/epistemic-ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

