<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ethics Etc &#187; Epistemology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ethics-etc.com/category/epistemology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ethics-etc.com</link>
	<description>A forum for discussing contemporary philosophical issues in ethics and related areas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>

		<item>
		<title>CF: Intuition and Evidence &#8211; Naturalistic or Anti-Naturalistic</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/15/cf-intuition-and-evidence-naturalistic-or-anti-naturalistic/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/15/cf-intuition-and-evidence-naturalistic-or-anti-naturalistic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=1632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[June 12 -14, 2012 Location: MSH Lorraine, Campus of the University of Lorraine, Nancy, France 91, av. de la Libération, 3rd floor. This conference is about intuitions and their epistemic role as evidence. Is there any epistemological explanation justifying the appeal to intuition in philosophy? How can different models of intuitions explain their possible roles? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/15/cf-intuition-and-evidence-naturalistic-or-anti-naturalistic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CF: Challenges to Religious and Moral Belief: Disagreement and Evolution</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/15/cf-challenges-to-religious-and-moral-belief-disagreement-and-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/15/cf-challenges-to-religious-and-moral-belief-disagreement-and-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=1624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[September 6-8, 2012 Purdue University The conference will focus on three main challenges to religious and moral beliefs: • Widespread interpersonal disagreement among intellectual peers on religious and on moral topics provides reason to doubt these beliefs; • Belief-source disagreement on moral issues between commonsense moral intuitions and religious belief sources raises doubts about both [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/05/15/cf-challenges-to-religious-and-moral-belief-disagreement-and-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CFA: SLACRR 3</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/09/21/cfa-slacrr-3/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/09/21/cfa-slacrr-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=1274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May 20 – 22, 2012 Moonrise Hotel in St Louis, MO Keynote Speaker: Jonathan Dancy (Reading/Texas) St. Louis Annual Conference on Reasons and Rationality (SLACRR) provides a forum for new work on practical and theoretical reason, broadly construed. Please submit an abstract of 750-1500 words by December 31, 2011 to SLACRR (at) gmail.com. In writing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/09/21/cfa-slacrr-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crispin Wright&#8217;s Philosophical Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/06/30/crispin-wrights-philosophical-ramblings/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/06/30/crispin-wrights-philosophical-ramblings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=1142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This summer Crispin Wright (NIP Director and Professor at NYU) will walk The Pennine Way, 268 miles across the Pennine mountain tops. The Aim: To raise money to support graduate students from elsewhere to visit the Northern Institute of Philosophy and to support Northern Institute of Philosophy graduate students to visit other institutions. This is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/06/30/crispin-wrights-philosophical-ramblings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CFP: Copenhagen Conference on Epistemic Inclusiveness and Trust</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/11/02/cfp-copenhagen-conference-on-epistemic-inclusiveness-and-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/11/02/cfp-copenhagen-conference-on-epistemic-inclusiveness-and-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3RD COPENHAGEN CONFERENCE IN EPISTEMOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN AUGUST 15-17, 2011 It is sometimes maintained that increased inclusiveness on part of epistemic practices generally leads to decreased accuracy of output. This idea, moreover, fuels the intuition that, were it not for important moral and political reservations, the proper approach to all matters epistemic would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/11/02/cfp-copenhagen-conference-on-epistemic-inclusiveness-and-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONF: Epistemic norms from a naturalist viewpoint</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/22/conf-epistemic-norms-from-a-naturalist-viewpoint/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/22/conf-epistemic-norms-from-a-naturalist-viewpoint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 04:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 7-8, 2010 Institut Jean-Nicod (Paris) THURSDAY 7 OCTOBER Salle Dussane Ecole Normale Supérieure 45, rue d&#8217;Ulm 10h30: Georgy Gergely (Budapest): Psychological Essentialism: The origins of representing artifact kinds. 11h45: Beate Sodian (Munich): Development of epistemic norm sensitivity in children. 13h00: lunch 14h30: Asher Koriat (HaÏfa): Subjective convictions and social consensus: Evidence from research on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/22/conf-epistemic-norms-from-a-naturalist-viewpoint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONF: Naturalism and the Nature of Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/18/conf-naturalism-and-the-nature-of-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/18/conf-naturalism-and-the-nature-of-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 03:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[47th Cincinnati Philosophy Colloquium 21-23 October 2010 425 Tangeman University Center University of Cincinnati Speakers: • Owen Flanagan, Duke University • Hilary Kornblith, University of Massachusetts • Michael Lynch, University of Connecticut • Penelope Maddy, University of California • David Papineau, King&#8217;s College London • L. A. Paul, University of North Carolina • Thomas Polger, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/18/conf-naturalism-and-the-nature-of-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stockholm Workshop on Ethics and Epistemology</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/05/06/stockholm-workshop-on-ethics-and-epistemology/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/05/06/stockholm-workshop-on-ethics-and-epistemology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 00:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stockholm June Workshop in Philosophy 2010: Ethics and Epistemology Thursday 3 June, 10 am &#8211; 5 pm, Room D207, Frescati Stockholm University 10.00 Welcome 10.05 Brian McElwee (Oxford): ‘The Structure of Demandingness Objections’. Commentator: Katharina Berndt (Stockholm). 11.05 Coffee 11.20 Åsa Wikforss (Stockholm): ‘What Justifies Beliefs about One&#8217;s Own Beliefs?’ Commentator: Sara Packalén (Stockholm). 12.20 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/05/06/stockholm-workshop-on-ethics-and-epistemology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Epistemic Normativity Workshop</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/04/07/fordham-epistemic-normativity-workshop/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/04/07/fordham-epistemic-normativity-workshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 05:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A workshop on epistemic normativity will be held at Fordham’s Lincoln Center campus in Manhattan, on April 16th and 17th, 2010. Visitors to the workshop are welcome, and attendance is free. If you are interested in attending, please contact Stephen Grimm at sgrimm (at) fordham.edu. The website for the workshop can be found here. I&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/04/07/fordham-epistemic-normativity-workshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workshop on theoretical and practical reasons</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/29/workshop-on-theoretical-and-practical-reasons/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/29/workshop-on-theoretical-and-practical-reasons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ulrike Heuer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ulrike Heuer's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http://sites.google.com/site/workshop2010site/home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the Centre for Ethics and Metaethics (CEM), University of Leeds Programme 24th June 2-3:30 Daniel Elstein: &#8216;Can We Do Without Epistemic Value?&#8217; 3:30-3:45 Coffee break 3:45-6:30 Symposium on Reasons and Evidence: Daniel Star, Stephen Kearns and Kieran Setiya 3:45-4:30 Daniel Star &#38; Stephen Kearns: &#8216;Weighing Reasons&#8217; 4:30-5:15 Kieran Setiya: &#8216;What Is A Reason to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/29/workshop-on-theoretical-and-practical-reasons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONF:  St Andrews-Rutgers Evidence Conference</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/29/conf-st-andrews-rutgers-evidence-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/29/conf-st-andrews-rutgers-evidence-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Date: 29 May, 2010 &#8211; 30 May, 2010 Location: Parliament Hall, St Andrews The philosophy departments at St Andrews and Rutgers are holding what looks to be a very interesting joint conference to examine philosophical questions about the nature and epistemic role of evidence. Programme Saturday 29th May 10.30–12.30 Ram Neta (UNC, Chapel Hill) &#8220;Easy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/29/conf-st-andrews-rutgers-evidence-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CFP: St. Louis Conference on Reasons and Rationality</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/12/cfp-st-louis-conference-on-reasons-and-rationality/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/12/cfp-st-louis-conference-on-reasons-and-rationality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/12/cfp-st-louis-conference-on-reasons-and-rationality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first St. Louis Annual Conference on Reasons and Rationality (SLACRR) will take place May 23-25, 2010 at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. The conference is designed to provide a forum for new work on practical and theoretical reason, broadly construed. Please submit an abstract of 500-1000 words by December 31, 2009 to SLACRR (at) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/12/cfp-st-louis-conference-on-reasons-and-rationality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copenhagen Epistemology Workshop</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/10/copenhagen-epistemology-workshop/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/10/copenhagen-epistemology-workshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/10/copenhagen-epistemology-workshop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Date: October 29, 2009 Venue: Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen (Amager), Room 14.2.50 Schedule: 10.30-12.00: Adam Carter (Edinburgh/Geneva): Knowledge, Testimony and Philosophical Expertise 13.15-14.45 S. Matthew Liao (Oxford): Disagreeing with Peers 15.00-16.30: Peter Graham (UC Riverside): Reliability and Entitlement 16.45-18.15: Mikkel Gerken (SERG, Copenhagen): Univocal Reasoning and Inferential Presuppositions There is no registration fee. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/10/copenhagen-epistemology-workshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Epistemology Workshop at Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/28/social-epistemology-workshop-at-copenhagen/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/28/social-epistemology-workshop-at-copenhagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/28/social-epistemology-workshop-at-copenhagen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Social Epistemology Research Group (SERG) at the University of Copenhagen is hosting a one-day epistemology workshop. The workshop is part of a series of workshops and conferences to be held in connection with the research project &#8220;The Epistemology of Liberal Democracy: Truth, Free Speech, and Disagreement,&#8221; funded by the Velux Foundation. The details are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/28/social-epistemology-workshop-at-copenhagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workshop on Disagreement at Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/05/workshop-on-disagreement-at-copenhagen/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/05/workshop-on-disagreement-at-copenhagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/05/workshop-on-disagreement-at-copenhagen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WORKSHOP ON DISAGREEMENT August 14, 2009 University of Copenhagen, Denmark CONFERENCE PROGRAM: 09.00 – 09.15: Coffee and tea 09.15 – 10.00: Berit Brogaard: Reasonable Disagreement and Entitlements to Trust 10.15 – 11.00: Richard Feldman: Evidentialism, Higher-Order Evidence, and Disagreements. 11.15 – 12.00: Jesper Kallestrup: Bootstrap and Rollback: Epistemic Circularity Generalized. 12.00 – 13.15: Lunch 13.15 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/05/workshop-on-disagreement-at-copenhagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epistemic Normativity Workshop at Fordham</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/04/epistemic-normativity-workshop-at-fordham/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/04/epistemic-normativity-workshop-at-fordham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/04/epistemic-normativity-workshop-at-fordham/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fordham University is holding a workshop on Epistemic Normativity on April 16th and 17th, 2010. Fordham University Lincoln Center Campus April 16th and 17th, 2010 Speakers: Jeremy Fantl (Calgary) &#038; Matt McGrath (Missouri) Richard Foley (NYU) John Greco (St. Louis) Thomas Kelly (Princeton) Michael Lynch (Connecticut) Linda Martin-Alcoff (CUNY) Wayne Riggs (Oklahoma) Dennis Whitcomb (Western [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/08/04/epistemic-normativity-workshop-at-fordham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CFP: Philosophical Methodology Conference at Arché</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/23/cfp-philosophical-methodology-conference-at-arche/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/23/cfp-philosophical-methodology-conference-at-arche/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/23/cfp-philosophical-methodology-conference-at-arche/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks like a fantastic conference especially for those who are interested in intuitions and thought experiments. The AHRC Project on ‘Intuitions and Methodology Project’ at the Arché Philosophical Research Centre is hosting a conference on Philosophical Methodology, 25-27 April, 2009, at the University of St. Andrews. Invited keynote speakers: David Chalmers (Australian National University) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/23/cfp-philosophical-methodology-conference-at-arche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reasons: Explanations or Evidence or Neither?</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/29/reasons-explanations-or-evidence-or-neither/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/29/reasons-explanations-or-evidence-or-neither/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Star</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daniel Star's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/29/reasons-explanations-or-evidence-or-neither/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Broome thinks normative reasons are either explanations or parts of explanations of why you ought to F. Stephen Kearns and I think normative reasons are evidence that you ought to F (and we propose this as a unified analysis that applies across both reasons for action and reasons for belief). Many philosophers working on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/29/reasons-explanations-or-evidence-or-neither/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jason Stanley&#8217;s Bank Case Poll</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Etc Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Jason Stanley (Rutgers University) has recently won the American Philosophical Association Book Prize for his book, Knowledge and Practical Interests. In this book, Stanely also tests and develops his theories and principles by means of intuitive judgments about cases. Here is a case from the book: [Bank Case 1:] Hannah and her wife Sarah [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

