<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ethics Etc &#187; Ethics Etc Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ethics-etc.com/category/ethics-etc-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ethics-etc.com</link>
	<description>A forum for discussing contemporary philosophical issues in ethics and related areas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>Poll: The Gang Leader Case</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/07/02/poll-the-gang-leader-case/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/07/02/poll-the-gang-leader-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics Etc Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=1159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone, I&#8217;d be quite interested in your intuitions regarding this case. So as not to bias anyone&#8217;s judgment unnecessarily, I&#8217;ll open the post for comments after I close the poll. Also, please vote only once. Thanks in advance! A member of a local gang went to the leader and said, ‘We are thinking of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/07/02/poll-the-gang-leader-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Would You Favor Moving the Eastern APA to Early January?</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/02/11/poll-would-you-favor-moving-the-eastern-apa-to-early-january/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/02/11/poll-would-you-favor-moving-the-eastern-apa-to-early-january/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics Etc Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though by no means everyone, a significant of number people I have spoken with about whether the dates for the Eastern APA should be moved have suggested that a plausible alternative may be to move it to sometime in the first two weeks of January. As noted in a previous post, the Modern Language Association [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/02/11/poll-would-you-favor-moving-the-eastern-apa-to-early-january/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Should the Dates of the Eastern APA Be Changed?</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/12/13/poll-should-the-dates-of-the-eastern-apa-be-changed/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/12/13/poll-should-the-dates-of-the-eastern-apa-be-changed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics Etc Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time of the year again, when a number of us will be separated from our family (for better or for worse), owing to the dates (Dec 27 to Dec 30) of the Eastern Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association. Here is a poll to see whether you think the dates of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/12/13/poll-should-the-dates-of-the-eastern-apa-be-changed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journal-relative or Journal-invariant Refereeing?</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/03/21/journal-relative-or-journal-invariant-refereeing/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/03/21/journal-relative-or-journal-invariant-refereeing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics Etc Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/03/21/journal-relative-or-journal-invariant-refereeing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: I&#8217;ve just added a new poll for this. Do vote away. :) A few weeks ago, a colleague and I were discussing whether when you are refereeing a paper for a journal, you should take into account the journal&#8217;s reputation, editorial policies, etc., when you are giving your verdict regarding the paper. For lack [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/03/21/journal-relative-or-journal-invariant-refereeing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Longest Time You&#8217;ve Taken to Review An Article Poll</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/07/25/the-longest-time-youve-taken-to-review-an-article-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/07/25/the-longest-time-youve-taken-to-review-an-article-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics Etc Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/07/25/the-longest-time-youve-taken-to-review-an-article-poll/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a really good discussion taking place at the Leiter&#8217;s Report on the timeliness of refereeing of articles. I&#8217;ve always thought that a possibly decent solution to this problem is a) for the journal editors explicitly to ask potential referees if they can give a verdict within 3 months and to send the paper [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/07/25/the-longest-time-youve-taken-to-review-an-article-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethicists Write Longer Papers Poll</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/08/ethicists-write-longer-papers-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/08/ethicists-write-longer-papers-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics Etc Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/08/ethicists-write-longer-papers-poll/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On why ethicists tend to write longer papers, Saul Smilansky has proposed the following hypothesis: 1. Do many people NOT write short papers because they believe that (with the exception of Analysis) the journals insist on longer papers? Do you have this perception? Do vote and let us know. I&#8217;m creating this post so that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/08/ethicists-write-longer-papers-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jason Stanley&#8217;s Bank Case Poll</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Etc Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Jason Stanley (Rutgers University) has recently won the American Philosophical Association Book Prize for his book, Knowledge and Practical Interests. In this book, Stanely also tests and develops his theories and principles by means of intuitive judgments about cases. Here is a case from the book: [Bank Case 1:] Hannah and her wife Sarah [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

