<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ethics Etc &#187; Moral Psychology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ethics-etc.com/category/moral-psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ethics-etc.com</link>
	<description>A forum for discussing contemporary philosophical issues in ethics and related areas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>

		<item>
		<title>Your Brain on Politics with Jonathan Moreno and Jonathan Haidt at NYU</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/03/28/your-brain-on-politics-with-jonathan-moreno-and-jonathan-haidt-at-nyu/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/03/28/your-brain-on-politics-with-jonathan-moreno-and-jonathan-haidt-at-nyu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applied Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=1571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thursday, March 29, 6:30pm -8:00pm Location: NYU Bookstore, 726 Broadway New York, NY 10003 &#8220;This is Your Brain on Politics: Why people believe what they want to believe, and deny science selectively&#8221; with Jonathan Moreno and Jonathan Haidt, moderated by S. Matthew Liao. Jonathan Moreno is David and Lyn Silfen University Professor of Ethics at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2012/03/28/your-brain-on-politics-with-jonathan-moreno-and-jonathan-haidt-at-nyu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Study of Character Website</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/05/31/the-study-of-character-website/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/05/31/the-study-of-character-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=1097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Character Project at Wake Forest University has launched a new website devoted to the academic study of character and related notions of virtue and vice. The website can be found here: http://www.studyofcharacter.com/ This site presents recent books, journal articles, and events pertaining to research on character, as well as faculty webpages, blogs, centers, encyclopedia [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/05/31/the-study-of-character-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CFP: Normative Implications of Moral Psychology</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/04/09/cfp-normative-implications-of-moral-psychology/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/04/09/cfp-normative-implications-of-moral-psychology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 04:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience of Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[University of Alabama at Birmingham NOVEMBER 11-13, 2011 SUBMISSION DEADLINE: AUGUST 31, 2011 The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) invites papers for a conference on the normative implications of recent work in moral psychology, broadly construed. The conference will be held in Birmingham, AL on November 11-13, 2011. The conference, to be hosted by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2011/04/09/cfp-normative-implications-of-moral-psychology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CFP: Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/10/03/cfp-southern-society-for-philosophy-and-psychology/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/10/03/cfp-southern-society-for-philosophy-and-psychology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 06:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[103rd Annual Meeting of The Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology New Orleans, Louisiana March 10-12, 2011 The Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology invites submission of papers for its annual meeting March 10-12, 2011 in New Orleans, Louisiana. The submission deadline is November 1, 2010. Founded in 1904, SSPP promotes philosophy and psychology by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/10/03/cfp-southern-society-for-philosophy-and-psychology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Purdue Summer Seminar on Perceptual, Moral, and Religious Skepticism</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/14/2011-purdue-summer-seminar-on-perceptual-moral-and-religious-skepticism/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/14/2011-purdue-summer-seminar-on-perceptual-moral-and-religious-skepticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 04:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent PhDs and ABD graduate students in philosophy, theology, psychology, or cognitive science are invited to apply for the 2011 Purdue Summer Seminar on Perceptual, Moral, and Religious Skepticism to be held at Purdue University in West Lafayette, IN from June 8th to June 24th, 2011. The seminar will be directed by Michael Bergmann (Purdue) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/09/14/2011-purdue-summer-seminar-on-perceptual-moral-and-religious-skepticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CFP: Reasons of Love</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/08/14/cfp-reasons-of-love/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/08/14/cfp-reasons-of-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Value Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[International Conference, Institute of Philosophy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium), 30 May-1 June 2011 This conference’s title is ambiguous on purpose. The relationship between love and reasons for action is highly interesting and complicated. It is not clear how love is related to reasons. Love might be a response to certain normative reasons, since it seems [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/08/14/cfp-reasons-of-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Truth in Cultural Relativism</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/04/25/the-truth-in-cultural-relativism/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/04/25/the-truth-in-cultural-relativism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Antti Kauppinen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antti Kauppinen's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do moral judgments form a psychological natural kind? Lately, Stephen Stich and his colleagues have been arguing on the basis of empirical evidence that the features psychologists have identified as key to moral judgment do not, as a matter of fact, cluster together in a lawlike fashion. In particular, they argue that harm attributions do [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/04/25/the-truth-in-cultural-relativism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spindel Conference 2010 Emerging Scholar Prize</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/04/spindel-conference-2010-emerging-scholar-prize/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/04/spindel-conference-2010-emerging-scholar-prize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Driver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Julia Driver's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/04/spindel-conference-2010-emerging-scholar-prize/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all, I just wanted to call your attention to the following: Call For Papers Spindel Prize for Emerging Scholar in Philosophy 2010 Spindel Conference Topic: Empathy and Ethics Conference Director: Remy Debes The University of Memphis Department of Philosophy is proud to announce that the topic for the 29th annual Spindel Conference will be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/03/04/spindel-conference-2010-emerging-scholar-prize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Krebs on Dialogical Love</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/02/19/krebs-on-dialogical-love/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/02/19/krebs-on-dialogical-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Angelika Krebs (University of Basel) will be giving a talk on Monday, Feb. 22, at the Oxford Moral Philosophy Seminar entitled &#8220;Dialogical Love.&#8221; A copy of Professor Kreb&#8217;s talk can be found here. Professor Krebs would welcome any comments/suggestions. Here’s an abstract of her talk: Love, says Martin Buber, is not about each partner [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/02/19/krebs-on-dialogical-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bias and Reasoning: Haidt&#8217;s Theory of Moral Judgment</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/02/10/bias-and-reasoning-haidts-theory-of-moral-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/02/10/bias-and-reasoning-haidts-theory-of-moral-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished a draft of a paper called &#8220;Bias and Reasoning: Haidt&#8217;s Theory of Moral Judgment.&#8221; Eventually, the final version of the paper will go into an edited collection called New Waves in Ethics, edited by Thom Brooks. In the meantime, I&#8217;d be really interested to learn what some of you think of this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2010/02/10/bias-and-reasoning-haidts-theory-of-moral-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Continuum Ethics book series</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/11/14/continuum-ethics-book-series/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/11/14/continuum-ethics-book-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thom Brooks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applied Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Kirchin's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thom Brooks's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/11/14/continuum-ethics-book-series/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuum Ethics A series of books exploring key topics in contemporary ethics and moral philosophy. Continuum Ethics presents a series of books that will bridge the gap between new research work and undergraduate textbooks. They will provide close examination of key concepts in contemporary moral philosophy. Aimed largely at upper-level undergraduates and research students, they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/11/14/continuum-ethics-book-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sentimentalism and Moral Grammar</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/05/sentimentalism-and-moral-grammar/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/05/sentimentalism-and-moral-grammar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Antti Kauppinen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antti Kauppinen's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/05/sentimentalism-and-moral-grammar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post, all too long and speculative, I will examine how a sentimentalist theory of moral thinking could exploit and improve recently popular theories of universal moral grammar, developed by John Mikhail, Susan Dwyer, Marc Hauser’s group, Gilbert Harman and Erica Roedder, and others. I’ll be drawing mostly on Mikhail’s 2009 ‘Moral Grammar and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/10/05/sentimentalism-and-moral-grammar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking About Reasons</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/09/15/thinking-about-reasons/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/09/15/thinking-about-reasons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Antti Kauppinen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antti Kauppinen's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/09/15/thinking-about-reasons/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expressivist accounts of normative judgment typically (always?) begin with all-things-considered verdicts: Hurrah (helping old ladies cross the road)! Boo (getting your little brother to murder)! But of course, many normative thoughts are not all-things-considered. I think there is some reason for me to go to bed early, and some reason for me not to do [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/09/15/thinking-about-reasons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Vice of Procrastination</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/05/07/the-vice-of-procrastination/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/05/07/the-vice-of-procrastination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sergio Tenenbaum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxford Moral Philosophy Seminar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergio Tenenbaum's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/05/07/the-vice-of-procrastination/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since it might take a while till I have a version of my contribution to the Moral Philosophy Seminar that is in reasonable shape, I am posting meanwhile a link to a &#8220;companion piece&#8221; to it. The piece is called &#8220;The Vice of Procrastination&#8221; and is forthcoming in a volume on procrastination (the contributors tried [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/05/07/the-vice-of-procrastination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should we all be sorry that we exist?</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/12/02/should-we-all-be-sorry-that-we-exist/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/12/02/should-we-all-be-sorry-that-we-exist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Saul Smilansky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saul Smilansky's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/12/02/should-we-all-be-sorry-that-we-exist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things have been philosophically very quite over here, so I thought that some of you might like to ponder the question whether you should be sorry that you exist. Some background explanation: Jean Kazez has been posting on the paradoxes in my recent book &#8220;10 Moral Paradoxes&#8221; in the blog Talking Philosophy. So far she [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/12/02/should-we-all-be-sorry-that-we-exist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new problem for psychological hedonism?</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/11/a-new-problem-for-psychological-hedonism/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/11/a-new-problem-for-psychological-hedonism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toby Ord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toby Ord's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/11/a-new-problem-for-psychological-hedonism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Psychological hedonism (PH) is the view that each person is motivated so as to maximise his or her pleasure and minimise his or her pain. Thus, according to psychological hedonism, acts which appear to be altruistic are in fact performed for self interested reasons, such as making the agent feel less guilty, or giving the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/11/a-new-problem-for-psychological-hedonism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journal of Moral Philosophy news</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/07/10/151/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/07/10/151/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thom Brooks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applied Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practical Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thom Brooks's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/07/10/151/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, we have learned the news that the Journal of Moral Philosophy will be a quarterly publication from 2009. This is a major change that I have been hoping to achieve for some time. The JMP was launched in April 2004 and since this time we have published three issues per year. I am particularly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/07/10/151/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utilitarianism and the Brain</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/03/21/utilitarianism-and-the-brain/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/03/21/utilitarianism-and-the-brain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Kahane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guy Kahane's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience of Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/03/21/utilitarianism-and-the-brain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody’s heard about Joshua Greene’s fMRI studies of moral judgement. Many have also heard about the study by Koenigs, Young, Adolphs, Cushman, Tranel, Cushman, Hauser and Damasio of patients with prefrontal damage. In a communication I co-authored with Nick Shackel and which has just come out in Nature, we criticise the methodology used in these [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/03/21/utilitarianism-and-the-brain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analogies between Linguistics and Moral Theory</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2007/11/14/analogies-between-linguistics-and-moral-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2007/11/14/analogies-between-linguistics-and-moral-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert Harman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gilbert Harman's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kamm Reading Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2007/11/14/analogies-between-linguistics-and-moral-theory/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erica Roedder and I are writing about possible analogies between linguistics and moral theory. One such analogy is between the development of generative grammar and the approach to moral theory by Frances Kamm, which has received considerable discussion in Ethics, Etc. An early draft of our (highly speculative) paper is available online at http://www.princeton.edu/~harman/Papers/Moral%20Grammar%20Draft.pdf and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2007/11/14/analogies-between-linguistics-and-moral-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

