<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ethics Etc &#187; Neil Levy&#8217;s Posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ethics-etc.com/category/neil-levys-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ethics-etc.com</link>
	<description>A forum for discussing contemporary philosophical issues in ethics and related areas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>

		<item>
		<title>The Moral Sense Test for Philosophers</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/14/the-moral-sense-test-for-philosophers/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/14/the-moral-sense-test-for-philosophers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Levy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experimental Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Levy's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Methods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/14/the-moral-sense-test-for-philosophers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of you will be familiar with the Moral Sense Test, which has produced some valuable data on ordinary people&#8217;s intuitions about trolley cases and related dilemmas. Eric Schwitzgebel, a philosopher of mind (who does fascinating work on the unreliability of first person judgments) and Fiery Cushman, from Marc Hauser&#8217;s lab at Harvard, have now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/14/the-moral-sense-test-for-philosophers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appiah&#8217;s Experiments in Ethics: Chapter 1</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/03/03/appiahs-experiments-in-ethics-chapter-1/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/03/03/appiahs-experiments-in-ethics-chapter-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Levy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appiah Reading Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Levy's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/03/03/appiahs-experiments-in-ethics-chapter-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chapter One is essentially a ground clearing exercise. Appiah’s aim is to argue that experimental philosophy is not the innovative and threatening enterprise that it might seem: instead, it is a return to philosophy’s roots. Philosophy has traditionally been closely informed by scientific work, and the best philosophers have often engaged in science themselves. It [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/03/03/appiahs-experiments-in-ethics-chapter-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kamm&#8217;s Intricate Ethics: Chapter 10 (a combative summary)</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2007/09/07/kamms-intricate-ethics-chapter-10-a-combative-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2007/09/07/kamms-intricate-ethics-chapter-10-a-combative-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 06:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Levy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kamm Reading Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Levy's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2007/09/07/kamms-intricate-ethics-chapter-10-a-combative-summary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purpose of this chapter is to show that concerns focused on the agent can supplement concerns focused on victims in bolstering the conclusion that agents ought not to infringe negative rights, even when the consequences of doing so are clearly better than the consequences of not infringing negative rights. That is, agent-focused considerations can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2007/09/07/kamms-intricate-ethics-chapter-10-a-combative-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

