• Contributors

  • Alastair Norcross
  • Alison Hills
  • Andrew Reisner
  • Antti Kauppinen
  • Bart Streumer
  • Brian McElwee
  • Dan Moller
  • Daniel Star
  • David Enoch
  • David Owens
  • David Wasserman
  • Fiona Woollard
  • Frances Kamm
  • Gerald Lang
  • Gilbert Harman
  • Guy Kahane
  • Helen Frowe
  • Iwao Hirose
  • James Morauta
  • Japa Pallikkathayil
  • Jeff McMahan
  • John Broome
  • John Oberdiek
  • Jonas Olson
  • Joseph Raz
  • Julia Driver
  • Krister Bykvist
  • Laura Franklin-Hall
  • Melinda Roberts
  • Matthew Smith
  • Matthew Silverstein
  • Mike Otsuka
  • Neil Levy
  • Nicholas Southwood
  • Nick Shackel
  • Nir Eyal
  • Rahul Kumar
  • Rebecca Roache
  • Richard Ashcroft
  • S. Matthew Liao
  • Saul Smilansky
  • Sergio Tenenbaum
  • Shlomi Segall
  • Simon Kirchin
  • Stephen Kearns
  • Thom Brooks
  • Toby Ord
  • Tom Douglas
  • Tom Hurka
  • Ulrike Heuer
  • Wlodek Rabinowicz

• Readings

  • 
    Secular Philosophy and the Religious Temperament
    Thomas Nagel
    
  • 
    Utilitarianism: A Guide for the Perplexed
    Krister Bykvist
    
  • 
    The Global Justice Reader
    Thom Brooks
    
  • 
    Well-Being and Death
    Ben Bradley
    
  • 
    The Beloved Self: Morality and the Challenge from Egoisim
    Alison Hills
    
  • 
    Ethics: The Fundamentals
    Julia Driver
    
  • 
    Origins of Objectivity
    Tyler Burge
    
  • 
    Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation
    Michael Strevens
    
  • 
    The Case for Contextualism
    Keith DeRose
    
  • 
    When Truth Gives Out
    Mark Richard
    
  • 
    The Idea of Human Rights
    Charles R. Beitz
    
  • 
    Willing, Wanting, Waiting
    Richard Holton
    
  • 
    The Idea of Justice
    Amartya Sen
    
  • 
    Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem
    Melinda A. Roberts and David T. Wasserman
    
  • 
    What Is Good and Why: The Ethics of Well-Being
    Richard Kraut
    
  • 
    Content and Justification
    Paul A. Boghossian
    
  • 
    Thoughts: Papers on Mind, Meaning, and Modality
    Stephen Yablo
    
  • 
    Normativity
    Judith Jarvis Thomson
    
  • 
    How We Get Along
    J. David Velleman
    
  • 
    Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity
    Christine M. Korsgaard
    
  • 
    Appearances of the Good: An Essay on the Nature of Practical Reason
    Sergio Tenenbaum
    
  • 
    Principled Ethics: Generalism As a Regulative Ideal
    Sean McKeever and Michael Ridge
    
  • 
    Killing in War
    Jeff McMahan
    
  • 
    Experimental Philosophy
    Joshua Knobe and Shaun Nichols
    
  • 
    Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought
    Michael Thompson
    
  • 
    The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory
    David J. Chalmers
    
  • 
    Ethics: Twelve Lectures on the Philosophy of Morality
    David Wiggins
    
  • 
    Disadvantage
    Jonathan Wolff and Avner de-Shalit
    
  • 
    Reconciling Our Aims: In Search of Bases for Ethics
    Allan Gibbard
    
  • 
    Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame
    T. M. Scanlon
    
  • 
    The Philosophy of Philosophy
    Timothy Williamson
    
  • 
    A Virtue Epistemology
    Ernest Sosa
    
  • 
    Morality without Foundations
    Mark Timmons
    
  • 
    Authority and Estrangement
    Richard Moran
    
  • 
    Moral Psychology, Volume 1
    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
    
  • 
    The Reflective Life
    Valerie Tiberius
    
  • 
    Moral Literacy
    Barbara Herman
    
  • 
    Ethics and the Environment: An Introduction
    Dale Jamieson
    
  • 
    On Human Rights
    James Griffin
    
  • 
    Experiments in Ethics
    Kwame Anthony Appiah
    
  • 
    Reasons without Rationalism
    Kieran Setiya
    
  • 
    Moral Realism: A Defence
    Russ Shafer-Landau
    
  • 
    The Way We Eat
    Peter Singer and Jim Mason
    
  • 
    Metaphysical Essays
    John Hawthorne
    
  • 
    Knowledge and Practical Interests
    Jason Stanley
    
  • 
    10 Moral Paradoxes
    Saul Smilansky
    
  • 
    Normativity and the Will
    R. Jay Wallace
    
  • 
    Ethics without Principles
    Jonathan Dancy
    
  • 
    Neuroethics
    Neil Levy
    
  • 
    Ideal Code, Real World
    Brad Hooker
    
  • 
    The Nature of Normativity
    Ralph Wedgwood
    
  • 
    Structures of Agency: Essays
    Michael E. Bratman
    
  • 
    The Second-Person Standpoint
    Stephen Darwall
    
  • 
    Ethics and the A Priori
    Michael Smith
    
  • 
    The Practice of Value
    Joseph Raz
    
  • 
    Weighing Lives
    John Broome
    
  • 
    Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm
    F. M. Kamm
    
  • 
    Reasons and the Good
    Roger Crisp
    
• 
  This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
  

From Professor Sandra Laugier (Sorbonne):

This conference is meant as an homage to Cora Diamond’s work in ethics, and focuses on its European reception. Her work has been translated in French and Italian in the recent years.

“Ethics, Imagination, and Forms of Life”
13-15 September 2010, Amiens, France
Pôle cathédrale, Placette Lafleur
Amphithéâtre Carré de Malberg
Admission free – open to graduate students and researchers
Contact : sandra.laugier (at) noos.fr

Monday, September 13th
Amphithéâtre Carré de Malberg

Opening
Sandra Laugier, Emmanuel Halais (UPJV, CURAPP)

1. ETHICS AND OBJECTIVITY
Chair : Vincent Descombes (EHESS)

Sometime ago, Mike Otsuka (UCL) mentioned here that Derek Parfit will be responding to an article by him and Alex Voorhoeve entitled ‘Why It Matters That Some Are Worse Off Than Others: An Argument against the Priority View’ here on Ethics Etc, with further responses from Mike and Alex, once Derek’s book, On What Matters, is published. In the meantime, the Manchester Centre for Political Theory (MANCEPT) has put together a really nice one day conference to discuss Mike’s and Alex’s paper.

Date: 19th November 2010
Time: 10.30am – 5.30pm
Location: University of Manchester, UK

Registration is now open for the 2010 conference of the British Society for Ethical Theory, to be held at the University of Nottingham, 7th-9th July. (This is the period directly before the 2010 Joint Session.)

Details of the programme and registration forms are available here:

http://www.bset.org.uk/nextconference.html

Keynote speakers:
Jamie Dreier (Brown)
Tim Mulgan (St. Andrews)

Submitted Papers:
“Value Incomparability and Indeterminacy” – Cristian Constantinescu (Cambridge)

“A New Theory of Well-Being” – Jennifer Hawkins (Duke)

“Sentimentalism and Deontological Intuitions” – Antti Kauppinen (Amsterdam/Trinity College Dublin)

“Faith in Humanity” – Ryan Preston-Roedder (Chapel Hill)

Stockholm June Workshop in Philosophy 2010:
Ethics and Epistemology
Thursday 3 June, 10 am – 5 pm,
Room D207, Frescati
Stockholm University

10.00 Welcome
10.05 Brian McElwee (Oxford): ‘The Structure of Demandingness Objections’. Commentator: Katharina Berndt (Stockholm).
11.05 Coffee
11.20 Åsa Wikforss (Stockholm): ‘What Justifies Beliefs about One’s Own Beliefs?’ Commentator: Sara Packalén (Stockholm).
12.20 Lunch
13.40 Karl Karlander (Stockholm): ‘The Varieties of Pain’. Commentator: Jonas Olson (Stockholm).
14.40 Break
14.45 Jonas Åkerman (Stockholm): ’Referential Intentions’. Commentator: Emma Wallin (Stockholm).
15.45 Coffee
16.00 Chris Heathwood (UC Boulder): ‘Could Morality Have a Source’? Commentator: Jens Johansson (Stockholm).

Do moral judgments form a psychological natural kind? Lately, Stephen Stich and his colleagues have been arguing on the basis of empirical evidence that the features psychologists have identified as key to moral judgment do not, as a matter of fact, cluster together in a lawlike fashion. In particular, they argue that harm attributions do not always evoke the signature moral response pattern of authority-independence and generality, and conclude that since the purported nomological cluster breaks down, moral judgments do not form a natural kind. Their argument, of course, leaves open the possibility that there is some other cluster to be found. I am not a big believer in nomological clusters, but I will propose an alternative content feature that does seem to pair with the signature moral pattern in a lawlike fashion. Namely, it seems that whenever people take a piece of behaviour to express, in context, any of a set of attitudes that ranges from disrespect to debasement, the signature moral pattern is evoked. (As usual, I’ll just focus on wrongness judgments.) In short, people are intuitive deontologists, and for all that Stich says, there may be a psychological natural kind of moral judgment. My alternative model involves commitment to a commonsense cultural relativism, but one of an entirely innocuous kind that poses no threat to moral objectivism. To distinguish it from standard or deference relativism, I’ll call it significance relativism.

The Second Annual Arizona Workshop in Normative Ethics will be held at the Westward Look Resort, Tucson, Arizona from January 6 through January 8, 2011.

Normative ethical theory addresses general questions about the right and the good and attempts to answer such questions as: What sorts of actions are right or wrong and why? What sort of person ought one to become and why? Normative ethical theories, including, for instance, versions of consequentialism, deontology, contractualism, natural law theory, and virtue ethics address such questions.

Keynote Speakers:
Robert Audi – David E. Gallo Professor of Business Ethics in the Mendoza College of Business and Professor of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame

Hi all, I just wanted to call your attention to the following:

Call For Papers
Spindel Prize for Emerging Scholar in Philosophy
2010 Spindel Conference Topic: Empathy and Ethics
Conference Director: Remy Debes

The University of Memphis Department of Philosophy is proud to announce that the topic for the 29th annual Spindel Conference will be “Empathy and Ethics.”

Professor Saul Smilansky (University of Haifa) will be giving a talk on Monday, March 1, at the Oxford Moral Philosophy Seminar entitled “Should We Be Sorry that We Exist?” A copy of Saul’s talk can be found here. Saul would welcome any comments/suggestions. Here’s an abstract of his talk:

JOURNAL OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY:
An International Journal of Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy
(ISSN 1740-4681)

Volume 7, Number 1 (2010)

ARTICLES

William Sin, ‘Trivial Sacrifices, Great Demands’, pp. 3-15

Lina Papadaki, ‘What is Objectification?’ pp. 16-36

M. B. E. Smith, ‘Does Humanity Share a Common Moral Faculty?’ pp. 37-53

Jonathan Seglow, ‘Associative Duties and Global Justice’, pp. 54-73

Miriam Ronzoni, ‘Constructivism and Practical Reason: On Intersubjectivity, Abstraction, and Judgment’, pp. 74-104

Kenneth R. Westphal, ‘From “Convention” to “Ethical Life”: Hume’s Theory of Justice in Post-Kantian Perspective’, pp. 105-32

REVIEW ARTICLE

JOURNAL OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY:
An International Journal of Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy
(ISSN 1740-4681)

Volume 6, Number 4 (2009)

ARTICLES

Ty Landrum, ‘Persons as Objects of Love’, pp. 417-39

Elizabeth Tropman, ‘Renewing Moral Intuitionism’, pp. 440-63

David Alm, ‘Deontological Restrictions and the Good/Bad Asymmetry’, pp. 464-81

Carl Knight, ‘Egalitarian Justice and Valuational Judgment’, pp. 482-98

Geoffrey Scarre, ‘The “Banality of Good”?’ pp. 499-519

REVIEW ARTICLE

Sean Coyle, ‘The Ideality of Law’, pp. 521-34

BOOK REVIEWS

Stefan Bird-Pollan on The Founding Act of Modern Ethical Life: Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Moral and Political Philosophy by Ideo Geiger, pp. 535-37

Continuum Ethics
A series of books exploring key topics in contemporary ethics and moral philosophy.

Continuum Ethics presents a series of books that will bridge the gap between new research work and undergraduate textbooks. They will provide close examination of key concepts in contemporary moral philosophy. Aimed largely at upper-level undergraduates and research students, they will also appeal to researchers in the field. Authors will be expected to combine philosophical sophistication with an accessible style that can engage the educated reader.

In this post, all too long and speculative, I will examine how a sentimentalist theory of moral thinking could exploit and improve recently popular theories of universal moral grammar, developed by John Mikhail, Susan Dwyer, Marc Hauser’s group, Gilbert Harman and Erica Roedder, and others. I’ll be drawing mostly on Mikhail’s 2009 ‘Moral Grammar and Intuitive Jurisprudence’, in Psychology of Learning and Motivation 50, 27–100 for moral grammar. The sentimentalist theory I sketch is my own, though heavily inspired by Adam Smith. It is independently motivated, but I believe it does a better job of explaining our intuitions than other views that highlight the role of emotions.

The British Academy, in association with the Centre de recherche en éthique de l’Université de Montréal, will be hosting an international conference on the work of Onora O’Neill, entitled “Ethics and Politics Beyond Borders: The Work of Onora O’Neill.

24-26 SEPTEMBER 2009
10 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1
Convenor: Professor David Archard (Lancaster University)

Thursday, 24 September 2009
12.00 Registration

1.30 Session 1: The ethics and politics of global justice
Welcome and opening remarks

Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem, edited by Melinda Roberts and David Wasserman, just came out!

From the back cover:
This collection of essays investigates the obligations we have in respect of future persons, ranging from our own future offspring to distant future generations. What are our obligations to persons who have not yet, but eventually will, come into existence? Can we harm them? Can we wrong them? Can the fact that our choice means that a worse off person will exist in place of a better off but “nonidentical” person make that choice is wrong?

This First Annual Arizona Workshop in Normative Ethics takes place at the Westward Look Resort in Tucson, Arizona, from January 7 to January 9, 2010. Here is the program for it, which looks great:

Thursday January 7

5:00–6:30 pm KEYNOTE ADDRESS
Holly M. Smith (Rutgers)
The Moral Clout of Reasonable Beliefs
Chair: David Schmidtz (University of Arizona)

On June 3-4, the Law and Philosophy Forum at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem will hold an international conference on extensions of justice. The conference is organized by Prof. David Heyd. Speakers and commentators include Axel Gosseries, Avner De-Shalit, Lukas Meyer, Daniel Statman, Melinda Roberts, David Enoch, Gustaf Arrhenius, Re’em Segev, David Miller, Chaim Gans, Shlomi Segall, Efrat Ram Tiktin, Joshua Cohen, Yitzhak Benbaji, Daniel Attas, and David Heyd.
You can find the conference program, and other details (and soon, we hope, also the papers) on the conference website, here.

An article by Alex Voorhoeve and me entitled ‘Why It Matters That Some Are Worse Off Than Others: An Argument against the Priority View’ has just been published in Philosophy & Public Affairs. The article includes a link to this post ‘for remarks by Derek Parfit in reply to this article, plus the authors’ response’. Unfortunately, this exchange won’t be ready until after Parfit has finished his book On What Matters. So once you see that book for sale, watch this space for his response to our critique. See below the fold for an abstract of the article:

Center for Ethics and Metaethics, Department of Philosophy, University of Leeds

30 June to 2 July
Venue: University of Leeds, Devonshire Hall
Further information:http://williamsconference.googlepages.com/home
Registration:http://williamsconference.googlepages.com/registration

Programme

Tuesday, 30 June

9:30 – 11:15 Susan Wolf (UNC, Chapel Hill): ‘“One Thought Too Many”: Love, Morality and the Ordering of Commitment’

Respondent: Brad Hooker (Reading)

15 min coffee break

11:30 – 1:15 Philip Pettit (Princeton): ‘The Inescapability of Consequentalism’

Respondent: Roger Crisp (Oxford)

Lunchbreak until 2:15

2:15 – 4 Jay Wallace (UC Berkeley): ‘Regret, Justification and Value. Reflection on Themes from “Moral Luck”’

Centre for Ethics and Metaethics and Department of Philosophy
University of Leeds
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Venue: IDEA-CETL Building (8-12 Fenton St.), Seminar Room 1

Schedule:

2:00-3:45pm
Prof Matthew Hanser (UC Santa Barbara): “Deferring to Others”

3:45-4:15pm
Coffee break

4:15-6:00pm
Dr Helen Frowe (Sheffield): “Obeying Orders”

6:00pm-
Drinks and dinner at a local restaurant

The first Annual Arizona Workshop on Normative Ethics will take place in Tucson, Arizona at the Westward Look Resort on January 7-9, 2010. Keynote speakers will be Thomas E. Hill (UNC, Chapel Hill), Holly Smith (Rutgers) and Peter Railton (Michigan).

Professor Mark Timmons invites those interested in presenting a paper at the workshop to submit a 2-3 abstract (double-spaced) by June 1, 2009. Only one submission per person please. Abstracts will be evaluated by a program committee and decisions made in early July.

Further information about the Workshop, submission of abstracts, and location can be found on the Workshop website:

keep looking »

• Search for:

• Polls

  In deciding whether to recommend acceptance or rejection of a paper for a journal, should one base one's decision in part on the reputation, editorial policies, etc. of the journal?

  • Yes
  • No

  View Results

   Loading ...

• Recent Posts

  • CFP: Morality and the Cognitive Sciences
  • Conference on Cora Diamond’s Work
  • CFP: Criminalization Conference
  • CFP: Reasons of Love
  • Eternal Sunshine and other Dangerous Ideas on Big Think
  • CONF: Problem with Priority?
  • CFP: North Carolina Philosophical Society
  • Grant Opportunities at the Character Project
  • 2nd Annual Dutch Conference on Practical Philosophy
  • JAP Prize

• Recent Comments

  • Patrick Lin on Eternal Sunshine and other Dangerous Ideas on Big Think
  • S. Matthew Liao on Eternal Sunshine and other Dangerous Ideas on Big Think
  • Patrick Lin on Eternal Sunshine and other Dangerous Ideas on Big Think
  • Łukasz Stafiniak on Smilansky on Should We Be Sorry That We Exist?
  • Amanda Quadling on Smilansky on Should We Be Sorry That We Exist?
  • Scott Harris on The Truth in Cultural Relativism
  • Mark Decker on Call for Abstracts: The Bowling Green Workshop in Applied Ethics and Public Policy
  • S. Matthew Liao on 2010 BSET Registration Open
  • Antti Kauppinen on 2010 BSET Registration Open
  • Antti Kauppinen on The Truth in Cultural Relativism
  • Angel Pinillos on The Truth in Cultural Relativism
  • Saul Smilansky on Smilansky on Should We Be Sorry That We Exist?
  • Travis Morgan on Smilansky on Should We Be Sorry That We Exist?
  • Saul Smilansky on Smilansky on Should We Be Sorry That We Exist?
  • Richard Chappell on Smilansky on Should We Be Sorry That We Exist?

• Categories

  • Alastair Norcross's Posts
  • Andrew Reisner's Posts
  • Antti Kauppinen's Posts
  • Appiah Reading Group
  • Applied Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Conference Announcement
  • Dan Moller's Posts
  • Daniel Star's Posts
  • David Enoch's Posts
  • David Wasserman's Posts
  • Dominic Wilkinson's Posts
  • Economics and Philosophy
  • Epistemic Ethics
  • Epistemology
  • Ethics Etc Poll
  • Experimental Ethics
  • Experimental Philosophy
  • Free Will
  • General Announcement
  • Gerald Lang's Posts
  • Gilbert Harman's Posts
  • Guy Kahane's Posts
  • Helen Frowe's Posts
  • Issues in the Profession
  • Iwao Hirose's Posts
  • Jonas Olson's Posts
  • Joseph Raz's Posts
  • Julia Driver's Posts
  • Kamm Poll
  • Kamm Reading Group
  • Legal Philosophy
  • Mark Sheehan's Posts
  • Metaethics
  • Metaphysics
  • Mike Otsuka's Posts
  • Moral Epistemology
  • Moral Psychology
  • Neil Levy's Posts
  • Neuroscience of Morality
  • Nick Shackel's Posts
  • Nir Eyal's Posts
  • Normative Ethics
  • Oxford Moral Philosophy Seminar
  • Philosophical Methods
  • Philosophy of Action
  • Philosophy of biology
  • Philosophy of Language
  • Philosophy of Mind
  • Political Philosophy
  • Practical Ethics
  • Rahul Kumar's Posts
  • Rebecca Roache's Posts
  • S. Matthew Liao's Posts
  • Saul Smilansky's Posts
  • Sergio Tenenbaum's Posts
  • Simon Kirchin's Posts
  • Stephen Kearns's Posts
  • Thom Brooks's Posts
  • Toby Ord's Posts
  • Tom Douglas's Posts
  • Ulrike Heuer's Posts
  • Value Theory

• Online Philosophy Journals

  • Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy
  • Philosopher’s Imprint
  • Philosophy Compass

• Philosophy Blogs

  • Arché Methodology Project Weblog
  • BrainEthics
  • Brains
  • Certain Doubts
  • David Chalmer’s List of Blogs
  • Epistemic Value
  • Experimental Philosophy
  • Flickers of Freedom
  • Legal Theory Blog
  • Leiter’s Report
  • Matters of Substance
  • Natural Rationality
  • Neuroethics and Law
  • PEA Soup
  • Philosopher’s Digest
  • Philosophy and Bioethics
  • Practical Ethics
  • Public Reason
  • The Brooks Blog
  • The Garden of Forking Paths
  • Thoughts, Rants, and Arguments

• Philosophy Resources

  • Experimental Philosophy Page
  • Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
  • Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz
  • Philosophy Journal Information
  • Philpapers
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Wide Scope Journal Surveys

• Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
•