<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ethics Etc &#187; Philosophical Methods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ethics-etc.com/category/philosophical-methods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ethics-etc.com</link>
	<description>A forum for discussing contemporary philosophical issues in ethics and related areas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>CONF: Intuition, Theory, and Anti-theory in Ethics</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/11/09/conf-intuition-theory-and-anti-theory-in-ethics/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/11/09/conf-intuition-theory-and-anti-theory-in-ethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/11/09/conf-intuition-theory-and-anti-theory-in-ethics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Date: July 3-4 2010 Location: The Informatics Conference Centre, George Square, Edinburgh Speakers: Talbot Brewer (University of Virginia) John Cottingham (University of Reading) Jonathan Dancy (University of Reading/ Texas) Brad Hooker (University of Reading) Edward Harcourt (Keble College, Oxford) James Lenman (University of Sheffield) Tim Mulgan (University of St Andrews) Michael Ridge (University of Edinburgh) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/11/09/conf-intuition-theory-and-anti-theory-in-ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surveying Loose Talk</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/09/19/surveying-loose-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/09/19/surveying-loose-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Antti Kauppinen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antti Kauppinen's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Mind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2009/09/19/surveying-loose-talk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first in a series of posts about recent work in experimental philosophy. I will be examining some persistent general issues with the different experimental approaches by way of looking at particular papers in some detail. I&#8217;ll begin with &#8216;Two Conceptions of Subjective Experience&#8217; by Justin Sytsma and Edouard Machery. The problem that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2009/09/19/surveying-loose-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Moral Sense Test for Philosophers</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/14/the-moral-sense-test-for-philosophers/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/14/the-moral-sense-test-for-philosophers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Levy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experimental Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Levy's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Methods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/14/the-moral-sense-test-for-philosophers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of you will be familiar with the Moral Sense Test, which has produced some valuable data on ordinary people&#8217;s intuitions about trolley cases and related dilemmas. Eric Schwitzgebel, a philosopher of mind (who does fascinating work on the unreliability of first person judgments) and Fiery Cushman, from Marc Hauser&#8217;s lab at Harvard, have now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/10/14/the-moral-sense-test-for-philosophers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UT-Austin Graduate Student Workshop on Philosophical Methodology, Aug. 12-16</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/05/ut-austin-graduate-student-workshop-on-philosophical-methodology-aug-12-16/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/05/ut-austin-graduate-student-workshop-on-philosophical-methodology-aug-12-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Driver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conference Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Driver's Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Methods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/05/ut-austin-graduate-student-workshop-on-philosophical-methodology-aug-12-16/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d like to draw your attention to the following: The UT-Austin philosophy department is pleased to announce a week-long graduate student workshop on philosophical methodology, August 12 – August 16. Possible workshop subtopics include (but are not limited to) intuition, conceptual analysis, reflective equilibrium, reduction, and ontological commitment. Already confirmed speakers include Julia Driver (Washington [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/05/ut-austin-graduate-student-workshop-on-philosophical-methodology-aug-12-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do ethicists write such long papers?</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/02/why-do-ethicists-write-such-long-papers/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/02/why-do-ethicists-write-such-long-papers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Saul Smilansky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normative Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saul Smilansky's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/02/why-do-ethicists-write-such-long-papers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been looking through the recent issue of Analysis. It has 13 papers, of which one is on meta-ethics, and there&#8217;s nothing in either normative or applied ethics. This is a fairly typical showing. There are occasional papers on free will (which is a distinct topic, combining metaphysics and ethics), but very little ethics as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/05/02/why-do-ethicists-write-such-long-papers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appiah Reading Group</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/31/appiah-reading-group/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/31/appiah-reading-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appiah Reading Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimental Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/31/appiah-reading-group/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the successful Kamm Reading Group, Ethics Etc will shortly be holding another reading group on Professor Kwame Anthony Appiah&#8217;s book, Experiments in Ethics. Professor Appiah is Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Philosophy at the Center for Human Values at Princeton University and the current President of the American Philosophical Association. The content of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/31/appiah-reading-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jason Stanley&#8217;s Bank Case Poll</title>
		<link>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S. Matthew Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Etc Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. Matthew Liao's Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Jason Stanley (Rutgers University) has recently won the American Philosophical Association Book Prize for his book, Knowledge and Practical Interests. In this book, Stanely also tests and develops his theories and principles by means of intuitive judgments about cases. Here is a case from the book: [Bank Case 1:] Hannah and her wife Sarah [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ethics-etc.com/2008/01/03/jason-stanleys-bank-case-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

