TOC

Journal of Political Philosophy

»Live-in Domestics, Seasonal Workers, and Others Hard to Locate on the Map of Democracy*
»The Redundancy Objection, and Why Scanlon is Not a Contractualist
»Jus ex Bello*
»Citizenship Goes Public: The Institutional Design of Anational Citizenship
»Collective Agents and Group Moral Rights*
»Consent to Sex: The Liberal Paradigm Reformulated*
»Power: A Pragmatist, Deliberative (and Radical) View*
»Authorisation and Authenticity: Representation and the Unelected*
»Derrida on Free Decision: Between Habermas’ Discursivism and Schmitt's Decisionism*
»Statist Cosmopolitanism*
»On Political Conspiracy Theories*
»Debate: Another Reason for Criminalizing Blackmail*
»Special Responsibility and the Appeal to Cost*
»Debate: Justification and Liability in War*
»Debate: Jeff McMahan on the Moral Inequality of Combatants
»Social Trust and the Ethics of Immigration Policy*
»Sei Shônagon and the Politics of Form
»Immigrants, Nations, and Citizenship*
»Making War on Terrorists—Reflections on Harming the Innocent*
»Scanlon on Substantive Responsibility*
»What is OnlineEarly?
»Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality*
»The Freedom of Collective Agents*
»Debate: The Concept of Voluntariness—A Reply
»The Journal of Political Philosophy Index, Volume 15 (2007)
»Survey Article: Justice in Production*
»Debate: Evading the Paradox of Universal Self-Ownership*
»Mandatory Rescue Killings*
»Nothing Personal: On Statistical Discrimination*
»Norms, Motives and Radical Democracy: Habermas and the Problem of Motivation*
»Predator and Prey: Seizing and Killing Suspected Terrorists Abroad*
»Ignorance, Incompetence and the Concept of Liberty*
»On Combating the Abuse of State Secrecy*
»On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency*
»Is Health Care (Still) Special?*
»Human Categories Beyond Non-essentialism*
»Individual and Collective Moral Responsibility for Systemic Military Atrocity*
»On Following Orders in an Unjust War*
»How to Include the Severely Disabled in a Contractarian Theory of Justice*
»Act and Circumstance in the Crime of Aggression*
»Debate: What is so Special About Religion? The Dilemma of the Religious Exemption*
»Toward an African Moral Theory*
»Debate: When Less Really is Less – What's Wrong with Minimalist Approaches to Human Rights*
»Distribution and Emergency*
»Why Lotteries Are Just*
»Terrorism, Shared Rules and Trust*
»Debate: The Concept of Voluntariness

Journal of Value Inquiry

»Excellence and Means: On the Limits of Buck-Passing
»The Time of Intrinsic Value
»News
»Human Flourishing: The Grounds of Moral Judgment
»Human Sacrifice Today
»Obligations of Nearness
»The Separateness of Persons and Liberal Theory
»Monstrous Thoughts and the Moral Identity Thesis
»Defending a Kantian Conception of Duties to Self and Others
»Iris Murdoch and the Extraordinary Ambiguity of Art
»The Problem of Interpersonal Comparisons of Pleasure and Pain
»An Aristotelian Account of Autonomy
»Constructing Practical Reason: O’Neill on the Grounds of Kantian Constructivism
»Allocating Scarce Medical Resources by Worth: Shaw’s Critique in The Doctor’s Dilemma
»News
»Against Fairness: Egalitarianism and Responsibility
»Desiring What is Desirable
»The Role of Standpoint in Justice Theory
»Frankfurt-Type Cases and the Necessary Conditions for Moral Responsibility
»Gene Patents and Justice
»Aristotle: Founder of the Ethics of Care
»When Waiting is Weightless: The Virtue of Patience
»Reconciling Themes in Neo-Aristotelian Meta-ethics
»Conflicts to Face When Values Conflict
»News
»Expressivism and the Practicality of Moral Convictions
»Ignorance, Indeterminacy, and Abortion Policy
»How to Make Ethical Universalization Tests Work
»News
»Satanic Motivations
»The Difference for Philosophy: Edith Stein and Martin Heidegger
»Freedom as Non-Domination, Normativity, and Indeterminacy
»The Role of Character in Ethical Decision-Making
»The Act—Omission Doctrine and Negative Rights
»Friends without Favoritism
»Introduction: Markets and Medicine
»Medical Innovation, Collapsing Goods, and the Moral Centrality of the Free-Market
»Collapsing Goods in Medicine and the Value of Innovation
»Sinister Innovations: Beware the Co-optation of Clinical Ethics Consultation
»In Defense of the Commercial Provision of Blood: Reactions to Voluntarism in the United States National Blood Policy in the Early 1970s
»Organ Procurement, Altruism, and Autonomy
»The Politics of Medical and Health Ethics: Collapsing Goods and the Moral Climate
»Collapsing Goods, Innovation, and Precaution
»The Morality of an Internet Market in Human Ova
»Innovation and the Persistent Challenge of Collapsing Goods
»Rights, Values, Regulation, and Health Care
»Research, Development, and the Availability of Health Care Products: The Market, Regulation, and Legal Liability
»Unusual Requests and the Doctor-Patient Relationship
»Justice in Health Care
»Individual Goods, Collective Goods, and the Aims of Medicine
»Commercial Medicine and the Ethics of the Profit Motive
»Social Constraint, Emergent Goods, and Human Kidney Markets
»Collapsing Goods and the Milieu of Innovation
»On Taylor on Autonomy and Informed Consent
»Maximizing Act Consequentialism and Friendship
»Korsgaard on Kant on the Value of Humanity
»Justifying and Applying Moral Principles
»The Idea of a Duty to Love
»A Good Kind of Egoism
»The Point of Studying Ethics According to Kant
»The Value of Humor
»Analyzing Wrongness as Sanction-Worthiness

Utilitas

»Volume 20 Issue 01
»Beccaria's Luxury of Comfort and Happiness of the Greatest Number
»Responses to Commentators on Intricate Ethics
»Happiness, the Self and Human Flourishing
»Value, Reason and Hedonism
»Pettit's Non-iteration Constraint
»Off Her Trolley? Frances Kamm and the Metaphysics of Morality
»Discerning Subordination and Inviolability: A Comment on Kamm's Intricate Ethics
»Double Effect, Triple Effect and the Trolley Problem: Squaring the Circle in Looping Cases
»Volume 19 Issue 04
»The Trolley Problem as a Problem for Libertarians
»Character, Global and Local
»Sidgwick's Epistemology
»Hume on Forgiveness and the Unforgivable
»What Even Consequentialists Should Say About the Virtues
»Pairwise Comparison and Numbers Skepticism
»Parity, Clumpiness and Rational Choice
»Rule-consequentialism and Internal Consistency: A Reply to Card
»William A. Edmundson, An Introduction to Rights. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy and Law series (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. xv + 223.
»Brian Barry, Why Social Justice Matters (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005), pp. vii + 311.
»T. M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1998), pp. 420.
»Hilary Putnam, Ethics without Ontology (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004), pp. ix + 129.
»Ajume H. Wingo, Veil Politics in Liberal Democratic States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. xvii + 162.
»The Non-identity Fallacy: Harm, Probability and Another Look at Parfit's Depletion Example
»Humean Reflections in the Ethics of Bernard Williams
»The Good and the Right
»Mill and the Secret Ballot: Beyond Coercion and Corruption
»The Nature of Pleasure: A Critique of Feldman
»Varieties of Hedonism in Feldman's Pleasure and the Good Life
»Reply to Elinor Mason and Alastair Norcross
»Volume 19 Issue 03
»Volume 19 Issue 02
»Infanticide
»When Utilitarians Should Be Virtue Theorists
»Does Non-Cognitivism Rest on a Mistake?
»Against Consequentialist Theories of Virtue and Vice
»Why One Basic Principle?
»Inconsistency and the Theoretical Commitments of Hooker's Rule-Consequentialism

Analysis

»Why contingent facts cannot necessities make
»Vocatives
»An objectivist argument for thirdism
»On a side effect of solving Fitch's paradox by typing knowledge
»Against composition as identity
»Conversational implicature and the cancellability test
»Oversimplification: a reply to White
»A simple solution to the hardest logic puzzle ever
»Does every proposition have a unique contradictory?
»Does ontic indeterminacy in boundaries entail ontic indeterminacy in identity?
»Moral fictionalism, the Frege-Geach problem, and reasonable inference
»Ramsey +  Moore ≠  God
»How to solve the problem of mixed conjunctions
»The irrelevance of the Consequence Argument
»Informativeness and Moore's Paradox
»Empty quotation
»Ancestral arithmetic and Isaacson's Thesis
»Supervaluationism, validity and necessarily borderline sentences
»Moderate monism and modality
»Correction
»Gravitas, moral efficacy and social causes
»‘Ought’ implies ‘can’ and the derivation of the Principle of Alternate Possibilities
»Retooling the Consequence Argument
»Is plural denotation collective?
»McDowell's identity conception of truth: a reply to Fish and Macdonald
»Complexity unfavoured
»Counterfactuals and context
»The contingencies of ambiguity
»The case against unconscious emotions
»Why we shouldn't give Ellis a dinch
»Drinking discretely: Parsons's Old Peculiar
»A problem for a posteriori essentialism concerning natural kinds
»Defending semantic generalism
»A comment on Bermúdez concerning the definability of identity
»Parting smoothly?
»A refutation of foundationalism?
»Does thought imply ought?
»Safety
»Scepticism about self-knowledge redux
»Every Now and Then, no-futurism faces no sceptical problems
»Is coherentism coherent?
»B-time: a reply to Tallant
»Determinism and prepunishment: the radical nature of compatibilism
»Index to Volume 67
»How probable is an infinite sequence of heads?
»Privative causality
»Basic deviance reconsidered
»Manipulating emotion: the best evidence for non-cognitivism in the light of proper function
»Mereological summation and the question of unique fusion
»Truthmakers, knowledge and paradox
»Omniscient beings are dialetheists
»Another objection to Wright's treatment of intention
»Counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism: a reply to Eagle
»A coherentist response to Stoneham's reductio
»Context-dependency and comparative adjectives
»Permission to cheat
»The folly of trying to define knowledge
»In praise of folly: a reply to Blome-Tillmann
»Self-knowledge and the limits of transparency
»If omniscient beings are dialetheists, then so are anti-realists
»A reductio of coherentism
»Correction

Philosophical Studies

»Plural signification and the Liar paradox
»The modal status of materialism
»Complex demonstratives as quantifiers: objections and replies
»Indirect perceptual realism and demonstratives
»Evidentialism and the problem of stored beliefs
»Liberalism and the general justifiability of punishment
»Empirical metaphysics: the role of intuitions about possible cases in philosophy
»Triviality arguments against functionalism
»The Donkey Problem
»Backwards explanation
»A defense of local miracle compatibilism
»Seeing and believing: perception, belief formation and the divided mind
»Why is a truth-predicate like a pronoun?
»Essentiality conferred
»Non-identity, self-defeat, and attitudes to future children
»Moral inertia
»Truthmakers and ontological commitment: or how to deal with complex objects and mathematical ontology without getting into trouble
»The inessential quasi-indexical
»The logic, intentionality, and phenomenology of emotion
»Indeterminacy and variability in meta-ethics
»What good is a diachronic will?
»A consistent way with paradox
»Assertion, Moore, and Bayes
»Is knowledge a natural kind?
»Structural equations and causation: six counterexamples
»Who they are and what de se: Burge on quasi-memory
»Fodor’s riddle of abduction
»Reference, perception, and attention
»The myth of the categorical counterfactual
»Promises beyond assurance
»Moral judgment purposivism: saving internalism from amoralism
»Self-representationalism and phenomenology
»Naturalism, fallibilism, and the a priori
»Concept Cartesianism, Concept Pragmatism, and Frege Cases
»Oughts and ends
»Summation relations and portions of stuff
»Contextualism, relativism and ordinary speakers’ judgments
»Means-end coherence, stringency, and subjective reasons
»The folk on knowing how
»Normativity without artifice
»Physicalsim and sparse ontology
»Imaginability, morality, and fictional truth: dissolving the puzzle of ‘imaginative resistance’
»Two-dimensionalism and the epistemology of recognition
»Utterance at a distance
»The Chrysippus intuition and contextual theories of truth
»Truth-conditions, truth-bearers and the new B-theory of time
»The event of color
»Comments on Wayne Martin, Theories of Judgment
»Wayne Martin on judgment
»Emergent substance
»Recurrent transient underdetermination and the glass half full
»Bennett and “proxy actualism”
»Kant and the problem of existential judgment: critical comments on Wayne Martin’s Theories of Judgment
»Towards a semantics for biscuit conditionals
»Contemplative withdrawal in the Hellenistic age
»In defense of adaptive preferences
»Empathy, social psychology, and global helping traits
»Epistemic instrumentalism, exceeding our grasp
»Thought-experiment intuitions and truth in fiction
»Inter-species variation in colour perception
»What you don’t know can’t hurt you: realism and the unconceived
»Kantian non-conceptualism
»Sher’s defense of blame
»Identifying and Dissolving the Non-Identity Problem
»Character, blameworthiness, and blame: comments on George Sher’s In Praise of Blame
»Moral responsibility and agents’ histories
»Was Kant a nonconceptualist?
»Noncomparabilism in epistemology
»Trumping the causal influence account of causation
»Memory and time
»On the alleged impossibility of Bayesian Coherentism
»The Humean problem of induction and Carroll’s Paradox
»Philosophical studies
»The epistemic regress problem
»Single premise deduction and risk
»Dispositions, rules, and finks
»The (near) necessity of alternate possibilities for moral responsibility
»A survival guide to fission
»A user’s guide to the evolutionary argument against naturalism
»Fictional coreference as a problem for the pretense theory
»The bundle theory and the substratum theory: deadly enemies or twin brothers?
»Brogaard and Salerno on antirealism and the conditional fallacy
»Generating possibilities
»Beyond Millianism
»Vague terms, indexicals, and vague indexicals
»Know-how and concept possession
»Problems for a quantificational theory of complex demonstratives
»The origins of concepts
»Don’t Know, Don’t Kill: Moral Ignorance, Culpability, and Caution
»Unrestricted composition and restricted quantification
»The contingency of composition
»Against essential normativity of the mental
»On that peculiar practice of promising
»Context, content, and relativism
»Evidentialism and pragmatic constraints on outright belief
»Why modal fictionalism is not self-defeating
»Replies to Green, Szabó, Jeshion, and Siebel
»An ideal solution to disputes about multiply realized kinds
»The ontology of meanings
»Mr. Magoo’s mistake
»Why ‘non-mental’ won’t work: on Hempel’s dilemma and the characterization of the ‘physical’
»A defense of intuitions
»Having reasons
»Structure and conventions
»I OUGHT, THEREFORE I CAN
»Identity in 4D
»Thoughts and ideas
»Fictionalism and the attitudes
»Reducing reductionism: on a putative proof for Extreme Haecceitism
»Belief, assertion and Moore’s Paradox
»The many minds account of vagueness
»“Rules” of language: A reply
»Reflections on likeness of meaning
»Note on the “Semantic” and the “Absolute” concept of truth
»Putting the lie on the control condition for moral responsibility
»Need there be implicit narrators of literary fictions?
»Expression, indication and showing what’s within
»Translucent experiences
»The obscure act of perception
»Précis of Meaning, Expression, and Thought
»The Newxin puzzle
»Rigid general terms and essential predicates
»There is No Simpliciter Simpliciter
»There are Kinds and Kinds of Kinds: Ben-Yami on the Semantics of Kind Terms
»Dispositions and normal conditions

Philosophical Review

»Utilitarianism without Consequentialism: The Case of John Stuart Mill
»Aquinas on Mental Representation: Concepts and Intentionality
»The Unreliability of Naive Introspection
»The Logical Foundations of Bradley's Metaphysics: Judgment, Inference, and Truth
»Speaking My Mind: Expression and Self-Knowledge
»Tracking Reason: Proof, Consequence, and Truth
»All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism
»Psychiatry in the Scientific Image
»Brute Rationality
»Expression and the Inner
»Situations and Individuals
»Generics: Cognition and Acquisition
»Divine and Human Happiness in Nicomachean Ethics
»CIA Leaks
»Complex Demonstratives, QI Uses, and Direct Reference
»Physicalism, or Something Near Enough
»Putting Logic in Its Place
»Insensitive Semantics: A Defence of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism
»Mapping Responsibility: Explorations in Mind, Law, Myth, and Culture
»Ethics and the Metaphysics of Medicine
»Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays
»Hume, Holism, and Miracles; Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles; A Defense of Hume on Miracles
»Erratum
»Prevention, Preemption, and the Principle of Sufficient Reason
»Normative Strength and the Balance of Reasons
»Color Pluralism
»Primary Goods, Capabilities,… or Well-Being?
»Locke on the Semantics of Secondary Quality Words: A Reply to Matthew Stuart
»Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge
»Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics
»Practical Conflicts
»Naturalism in Question
»Weighing Lives
»Belief in Kant
»Eligibility and Inscrutability
»The Problem with Charlie: Some Remarks on Putnam, Lewis, and Williams
»Craziness and Metasemantics
»`There's something it's like' and the Structure of Consciousness
»Deflating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism
»Kant on Representation and Objectivity
»Wittgenstein on the Arbitrariness of Grammar
»On Consciousness
»Truth and Paradox: Solving the Riddles
»Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context
»Objective and Unconditioned Value
»Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News
»Serious Actualism
»Critical Notice of Scott Soames's Case against Two-Dimensionalism
»Thinking How to Live
»The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life
»Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions
»The Ethics of Assistance
»Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights
»Faith, Reason, and the Existence of God
»Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing
»Minimal Semantics
»Kant's Theory of Knowledge: An Analytical Introduction
»Heidegger's Confusions
»The Persecutor's Wager
»Parthood
»Some Counterexamples to Causal Decision Theory
»The Aesthetic Function of Art
»Artistic Truth: Aesthetics, Discourse, and Imaginative Disclosure
»Utilitarianism: Restorations, Repairs, Renovations
»Ethics without Principles
»Liberty, Desert, and the Market: A Philosophical Study
»Adorno's Negative Dialectic: Philosophy and the Possibility of Critical Rationality
»Historical Ontology
»Philosophy of Experimental Biology
»Themes in Kant's Metaphysics and Ethics
»Manifest Activity: Thomas Reid's Theory of Action
»A Theory of Bondage
»Assertion, Knowledge, and Rational Credibility
»Frege on Indexicals
»Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century
»Interpretation and Construction: Art, Speech, and the Law
»Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity
»Locke's Philosophy of Language
»Ethics without Ontology
»Moral Realism: A Defence
»The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value
»Mindsight: Image, Dream, Meaning
»Adoption Matters: Philosophical and Feminist Essays

Mind

»Goodness and Reasons: Accentuating the Negative
»Desires
»Rule-Following, Explanation-Transcendence, and Private Language
»Vague Representation
»Truth, Assertion, and the Horizontal: Frege on 'The Essence of Logic'
»Does Frege Use a Truth-Predicate in his 'Justification' of the Laws of Logic? A Comment on Weiner
»How Tarskian is Frege?
»Coherence as a Heuristic
»Partial Belief, Partial Intention
»On Linking Dispositions and Conditionals
»Kant's Formula of Humanity
»Russell's Last (and Best) Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgement
»Syntax, More or Less
»Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Scepticism
»On Telling and Trusting
»A Tale of Two Envelopes
»Understanding Mixed Quotation
»Frege's Theory of Hybrid Proper Names Developed and Defended
»Epistemic Modals
»Millican on the Ontological Argument
»Ontological Arguments and the Superiority of Existence: Reply to Nagasawa
»Existence and Identity in Free Logic: A Problem for Inferentialism?
»Existence and Identity in Free Logic: Two Comments
»Index of MIND Vol. 116 Nos 1 4, 2007
»Deciding to Believe Again
»The Third Way on Objective Probability: A Sceptic's Guide to Objective Chance
»Infinitism Regained
»Action and Self-Location in Perception
»Supervaluationism and Its Logics
»What's in a Numeral? Frege's Answer
»Knowledge Beyond the Margin for Error
»Knowledge Within the Margin for Error

Journal of Moral Philosophy

»Moral and Theological Realism: The Explanatory Argument
»Anti-Reductionism and Supervenience
»Does Rationality Consist in Responding Correctly to Reasons?
»Practical Reason, Value and Action
»Normativity and Practical Judgement
»Normativity and Reason
»Referees for Volume 4
»Experts, Practitioners, and Practical Judgement
»Simplicity and Authority: Reflections on Theory and Practice in Kant's Moral Philosophy
»Kant, Garve, and the Motives of Moral Action
»Kant against Hobbes in Theory and Practice
»Kant against Hobbes: Reasoning and Rhetoric
»Duty, Nature, Right: Kant's Response to Mendelssohn in Theory and Practice III
»Time-Relative Interests and Abortion
»How Devolution Upsets Distributive Justice
»Review Article: Aggregation and Non-Utilitarian Moral Theories
»Books Received
»Moral Particularism: An Introduction
»Particularism and Default Valency
»Particularism and Reasons: A Reply to Kirchin
»Ethics Without Reasons?
»Crisp's 'Ethics Without Reasons?': A Note on Invariance
»Turning on Default Reasons
»Practical Reasoning and Normative Relevance: A Reply to McKeever and Ridge
»Defending the Right
»The Structure of Empathy
»Tracing Global Inequality in Eco-space: A Comment on Tim Hayward's Proposal
»Equality: The Recent History of an Idea

Ethics

»Beyond Price
»True and Proper Selves: Velleman on Love
»From Humanitarian Intervention to Assassination: Human Rights and Political Violence
»Punishment and Justification
»The Worst Time to Die
»Ideal Agency and the Possibility of Error
»Book Review: Anita L. Allen, Why Privacy Isn’t Everything: Feminist Reflections on Personal Accountability
»Book Review: Catherine Audard, John Rawls
»Book Review: Lawrence Blum, “I’m Not a Racist, but …”: The Moral Quandary of Race
»Book Review: Alice Crary, Beyond Moral Judgment
»Book Review: Maria Dimova‐Cookson and W. J. Mander, eds., T. H. Green: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Political Philosophy
»Book Review: Béatrice Longuenesse, Kant on the Human Standpoint
»Book Review: William Rehg and James Bohman, eds., Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory; Essays in Honor of Thomas McCarthy
»Book Review: Tommie Shelby, We Who Are Dark: Philosophical Foundations of Black Solidarity
»Book Review: Bernard Williams, The Sense of the Past: Essays in the History of Philosophy
»Book Review: Ajume H. Wingo, Veil Politics in Liberal Democratic States
»Book Review: Jonathan Wolff and Avner de‐Shalit, Disadvantage
»Book Review: Michael Zimmerman, The Nature of Intrinsic Value
»Book Notes
»Notes on Contributors
»Announcement
»Editorial
»Autonomy and the Second Person Within: A Commentary on Stephen Darwall’s The Second‐Person Standpoint
»Reasons, Relations, and Commands: Reflections on Darwall
»Morality as Equal Accountability: Comments on Stephen Darwall’s The Second‐Person Standpoint
»Reply to Korsgaard, Wallace, and Watson
»Moral Address, Moral Responsibility, and the Boundaries of the Moral Community
»Particular Reasons
»Book Review: Cristina Bicchieri, The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms
»Book Review: Roger Crisp, Reasons and the Good
»Book Review: Noah Feldman, Divided by God
»Book Review: David Gauthier, Rousseau: The Sentiment of Existence
»Book Review: Jonathan Glover, Choosing Children: Genes, Disability, and Design
»Book Review: Vladimir Jankélévitch, Forgiveness
»Book Review: Jean‐Luc Marion, The Erotic Phenomenon
»Book Review: Gary Pendlebury, Action and Ethics in Aristotle and Hegel: Escaping the Malign Influence of Kant
»Book Review: Mark R. Reiff, Punishment, Compensation, and Law: A Theory of Enforceability
»Book Review: Thomas C. Schelling, Strategies of Commitment and Other Essays
»Book Review: Sergio Tenenbaum, Appearances of the Good: An Essay on the Nature of Practical Reason
»Book Review: Christopher Heath Wellman and A. John Simmons, Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?
»Notes on Contributors
»Announcement
»Introduction
»Fair Opportunity in Education: A Democratic Equality Perspective
»Equality, Adequacy, and Education for Citizenship
»Cognitivism about Instrumental Reason
»A Sensible Antiporn Feminism
»Why Killing Some People Is More Seriously Wrong than Killing Others
»Book Review: Daniel Bell, Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context
»Book Review: Daniel A. Bell and Avner de‐Shalit, eds., Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller’s Political Philosophy
»Book Review: William Connolly, Pluralism
»Book Review: John Martin Fischer, My Way
»Book Review: Harry Frankfurt, On Truth
»Book Review: Immanuel Kant, Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History
»Book Review: George Kateb, Patriotism and Other Mistakes
»Book Review: Hugh Lacey, Values and Objectivity in Science: The Current Controversy about Transgenic Crops
»Book Review: Michael S. Pritchard, Professional Integrity
»Book Review: James Rachels, The Legacy of Socrates: Essays in Moral Philosophy
»Book Review: John Rawls, Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy
»Book Review: R. Jay Wallace, Normativity and the Will
»Book Notes
»Announcement
»Notes on Contributors
»Volume 117, number 4: Equality, Adequacy, and Education for Citizenship
»Volume 117, number 4: Fair Opportunity in Education: A Democratic Equality Perspective
»Volume 117, number 4: Cognitivism about Instrumental Reason
»Volume 117, number 4: Why Killing Some People Is More Seriously Wrong than Killing Others
»Volume 117, number 4: A Sensible Antiporn Feminism
»Volume 117, number 4: Introduction
»Volume 117, number 3: Does Social Justice Matter? Brian Barry's Applied Political Philosophy
»Volume 117, number 3: Why Social Justice Is Not All That Matters: Justice as the First Virtue
»Volume 117, number 3: When Justice Matters
»Volume 117, number 3: Voices from Another World: Must We Respect the Interests of People Who Do Not, and Will Never, Exist?
»Volume 117, number 3: Caring and Full Moral Standing
»Volume 117, number 3: Is Terrorism Distinctively Wrong?

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

»How Are Basic Belief-Forming Methods Justified?
»Précis of Gut Reactions
»Three Grades of Immediate Perception: Thomas Reid’s Distinctions
»Sensorimotor Knowledge and Naïve Realism
»Scepticism, Knowledge, and Forms of Reasoning
»Content and Constancy: phenomenology, psychology, and the content of perception
»Contextualism and the Factivity Problem
»Response to D’Arms and Hills
»A New Argument for Nonconceptual Content
»Recent Publications
»Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism
»Reply to Campbell, Martin, and Kelly
»"Whatever begins to exist must have a cause of existence": Hume’s Analysis and Kant’s Response
»Précis of Action In Perception: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
»Teleological Realism
»Klein on the Unity of Cartesian and Contemporary Skepticism
»Prinz’s Theory of Emotion1
»Commentary on Action in Perception
»Response to Gut Reactions
»Assertion, Practical Reason, and Pragmatic Theories of Knowledge
»Reply to Egan and Clark
»The Order of Evils: Toward an Ontology of Morals
»Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study
»Wright on the McKinsey Problem
»Seeing, Doing, and Knowing: A Précis
»Hudson on Location
»Hudson Fine Tunes His Way to Hyperspace
»The Roots of Evil
»The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate
»Reply to Parsons, Reply to Heller, and Reply to Rea
»Classes of Sensory Classification: A Commentary on Mohan Matthen, Seeing, Doing, and Knowing
»Semivaluationism: Putting Vagueness in Context in Context*
»Social Psychology, Moral Character, and Moral Fallibility*
»Erratum: Erratum
»Hyperspace and The Best World Problem: A Reply To Hud Hudson
»Précis of The Metaphysics of Hyperspace
»On the Methodology of the Race Debate: Conceptual Analysis and Racial Discourse
»What Am I? Virtual Machines and the Mind/Body Problem
»The Content of Color Experience
»Much Ado About Nothing: Priest and the Reinvention of Noneism
»Truth and Predication
»The Ontology of Time
»Expression for Expressivists
»Précis of Towards Non-Being
»Thinking About Knowing
»Property Dualism, Epistemic Normativity and the Limits of Naturalism*
»Replies to Nolan and Kroon
»Testimonial Knowledge in Early Childhood, Revisited1
»Cognitive Integration and the Ownership of Belief: Response to Bernecker
»Kripke. Names, Necessity, and Identity
»